Some stories glide in from left field and land squarely in the “unclassifiable” folder. Today’s entry: a mallard duck has been clocked by a Swiss speed camera doing 52 kilometers per hour (32 mph) in a 30 km/h zone in the Bernese suburb of Köniz. This is odd enough. What lifts it into the realm of the truly uncanny, as detailed by swissinfo, is that authorities suspect this swift waterfowl might just be a repeat offender.
Déjà Vu in Double Time
The facts: On April 13, Swiss police sifting through recent radar images found themselves confronted not by the usual blur of German luxury sedans, but a mallard mid-flight. Officials from the Köniz municipality, as the outlet documents, determined the bird was moving at 52 km/h—well above the posted 30 km/h limit, and well into “ticketable offense” territory (assuming, of course, one can issue citations to ducks).
If all this triggers a sense of familiarity, you’re not alone. The municipality’s Facebook post added an extra layer of peculiarity: exactly seven years prior, to the day, a remarkably similar-looking duck was clocked in the same spot, at the same speed. Coverage by The Guardian highlights municipal musings about whether a case of avian recidivism was hiding in plain sight—or if the universe was playing a quietly elaborate joke.
Adding to the surreal spreadsheet of coincidences, Insider Paper reports that the story originally came to light through the Berner Zeitung newspaper before the municipality’s announcement. The duck was not only caught at the same location and speed, but the photos were snapped on the exact anniversary of the original incident—statistically improbable, but evidently within the realm of duck and human possibility.
Fact-Checking the Fowl
The immediate question from officials: Is there a crack in the system, or are these ducks just really that consistent? Susanne Bandi, responsible for communications in Köniz, told swissinfo that the municipality initially wondered whether the images were manipulated or if this was an elaborate prank. The possibility of a belated April Fool’s joke wasn’t off the table, at least until investigators dug into the system’s integrity.
Police, according to reports reviewed by both swissinfo and The Guardian, assured all concerned parties that the radar system is regularly calibrated and checked by the Swiss Federal Institute of Metrology (METAS). The computers undergo annual tests, and photographic evidence is securely sealed to prevent tampering. In other words, the chain of evidence is about as airtight as Swiss watch escapements—leaving little room for digital sleight of hand.
With the technical possibility of a system malfunction effectively ruled out, remains the gently amusing idea that Köniz may be home to a highly punctual and unusually speedy duck—or, less likely but not impossible, a single bird living out its golden years reprising a youthful brush with the law. According to data cited in swissinfo, mallards can live between five and ten years. That’s just enough overlap to amuse statisticians and local police alike without entirely closing the case.
Legal Loopholes for Ducks?
Then there’s the philosophical angle. Who exactly are these speed limits for? The Guardian documents the astonishment of police officers, unused to doling out citations to non-humans but apparently ready to consider all angles when faced with such avian agility. The law may not have been written with ducks in mind, but speed cameras lack discretion; anything over the line gets a mugshot, regardless of bill or beak.
A small irony, as noted by swissinfo, is the bureaucratic rigor applied to a duck’s actions. Calibrations, annual checks, image sealing—all these human measures, aligned against a bird simply pursuing its own business above a Swiss boulevard. One suspects the mallard’s only crime, in its own estimation, is outrunning a local competitor for a particularly nice pond.
What does it say about us that systems built for road safety now double as reluctant nature photographers? And if this is happening in Switzerland, are there other cities quietly filing away images of startled squirrels, bold foxes, or the odd rabbit with a lead foot?
More Questions Than Answers (As Usual)
In the end, no ticket was issued (insider tip: ducks rarely provide a forwarding address), and the case landed not in traffic court but in the local paper—and, ultimately, the global round-up of wonderfully needless bureaucracy. According to Insider Paper, municipal authorities erred on the side of transparency, choosing to publicly share their bemusement and lay to rest conspiracy theories around potential April foolishness.
Still, the incident hangs in the air like feathers after a pillow fight. Was this just the world’s most punctual duck? A legacy bird honoring the record of its ancestor? Or, as local officials considered, a subtle nudge from fate reminding society that there’s still room for the unpredictable and absurd in even the most tightly regulated corners of daily life? How many other “criminals” in the animal kingdom are evading justice thanks to a lack of wallet and opposable thumbs?
Whatever the answer, one thing’s certain: in a land famous for order, sometimes chaos flies in on webbed wings—snapshots and speed limits be damned.