Wild, Odd, Amazing & Bizarre…but 100% REAL…News From Around The Internet.

Final Words From Death Row Include Political Endorsement

Summary for the Curious but Committed to Minimal Effort

  • In a startling final statement before his execution, Glen Rogers—dubbed the “Casanova Killer”—endorsed President Trump, saying “President Trump, keep making America great. I’m ready to go,” a moment that left witnesses bewildered.
  • Rogers’ last hours combined the mundane (waking at 3:45 a.m., a last meal of pizza, chocolate and soda, and family visits) with personal reflection—expressing love for his family and pledging to answer victims’ relatives’ lingering questions—before pivoting to political commentary.
  • Convicted for the 1995 murder of Tina Marie Cribbs and tied to multiple other killings, Rogers was notorious for sensational embellishments—once claiming up to 70 victims and falsely linking himself to the Simpson-Goldman case despite LAPD denials.

Sometimes the strangest moments in public life arrive at the most unsettling times. Take, for example, the tradition of the condemned’s last words—a window that often reveals regret, anger, or love, but seldom an unsolicited campaign endorsement. Yet Glen Rogers, best known as the “Casanova Killer,” made headlines by departing this world with a phrase fit for a political rally rather than a somber chamber.

Shout-Outs From the Execution Chamber

As recounted in USA TODAY’s coverage, Rogers, awaiting lethal injection at Florida State Prison, used his final moment to say, “President Trump, keep making America great. I’m ready to go.” His words didn’t exactly land with the dignity of a final blessing or the defiance of a last protest—they produced confusion, even among the most prepared witnesses. Family members of victims in attendance, according to the outlet, exchanged glances and muttered their disbelief, with comments such as, “What the hell?” echoing in the execution witness area. This wasn’t the catharsis or closure some might have anticipated from a high-profile execution.

In a detail highlighted by the Tampa Free Press, Rogers’ final hours included precisely the kind of ordinary choices that contrast so sharply with the extraordinary context: he awoke at 3:45 a.m., shared a last meal of pizza, chocolate, and soda, and visited with someone before the procedure. During his final statement, the outlet also notes, he expressed love for his family and a vague promise that lingering questions for his victims’ families would “in the near future… be answered,” offering what might generously be called closure. Only after these remarks did he pivot into direct political commentary.

The room’s confusion raises the inevitable question: Was Rogers seeking relevance, making a final dig, or simply inhabiting the surreal intersection of American crime and political fan culture?

A Serial Killer’s Farewell Tour

The context behind Rogers’ execution seems almost routine by the standards of true crime. As described in USA TODAY, Rogers’ notoriety stems from the 1995 murder of Tina Marie Cribbs—a 34-year-old mother of two he met at a bar. Authorities also tied him to several other killings spanning multiple states; the victims, as observed in the reporting, often fit a pattern: women in their thirties, often with red hair.

Rogers hardly shied from embellishment. NewsBreak, referencing information from both NBC News and law enforcement, describes how he once told police he’d killed up to 70 people, a claim he later denied. His penchant for dramatic confession extended to the 1994 murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, which, according to the Los Angeles Police Department, did not have credible links to Rogers despite media speculation after a 2012 documentary. The outlet notes that the LAPD pointedly said, “We know who killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. We have no reason to believe that Mr. Rogers was involved.”

Ultimately, the persona of the “Casanova Killer”—a man of claimed charms, actual brutality, and a flair for the melodramatic—remained consistent through to the end. Offered one last chance at the microphone, he assembled a statement as jarring as his criminal resume.

The Trump of It All

Rogers’ parting words managed to drag national politics onto center stage of the execution chamber. Even for a period marked by headlines that often blur the boundaries of reality and spectacle, this stands out. The Tampa Free Press outlines the particulars: the inmate’s dying words echoed a presidential slogan, with no clear connection beyond the theater of the moment.

Trump’s own stance on the death penalty, as previously reported in USA TODAY, leaves little doubt as to his approach: calling for broader and swifter use of capital punishment, and recently issuing an executive order restoring federal executions. His order declared, “Only capital punishment can bring justice and restore order in response to such evil,” a sentiment unlikely to soften the ethical debates around the practice or to anticipate the company it would keep in the history books.

Given Rogers’ reputation for mythmaking and spectacle, is it any surprise that political branding inserted itself, uninvited and slightly surreal, at the end? The question isn’t so much whether this endorsement was political or personal, genuine or performative—but what it says about the age we’re living in, where the trappings of fame, infamy, and slogans seem to swirl together at life’s final curtain.

Last Words and Lingering Questions

What are we to make of a convicted serial killer using his final breath not for apology or defiance but to echo a campaign? As observed across the reports from the Times, the Free Press, and NBC, this isn’t a trend, just a particularly American intersection of notoriety, politics, and spectacle.

Perhaps last words, like everything else, are susceptible to the currents of cultural obsession—where notoriety seeks a spotlight, no matter how fleeting. And perhaps, in the ever-stranger annals of American history, we’ll simply mark this as another moment that leaves us scratching our heads and wondering if we’ve truly reached the end of the peculiar, or if there’s always another twist waiting.

Sources:

Related Articles:

When the urge to protect your neighborhood collides with true-crime curiosity, things can get strangely theatrical—just ask the Florida family held at gunpoint by a self-appointed genealogist determined to play “Who’s Your Daddy?” the hard way. How far is too far when skepticism takes center stage? Some Floridian stories don’t need embellishment—just room for a raised eyebrow.
Think you’ve outgrown the perils of the playground? Think again. This week, a Connecticut man learned firsthand that slides—and scale—don’t always play nice with adulthood, requiring local firefighters and a fair bit of ventilation to set him free. Why do we keep gravitating toward tight spots, literally and figuratively? Read on for the curious calculus of confined spaces and thwarted nostalgia.
Modern love lives can be complicated, but rarely do they involve secret identities, eight chihuahuas, and felony theft—not to mention a corpse hidden under an air mattress. When a Lakewood, Colorado polycule took “it’s complicated” beyond reason, police uncovered a true-crime tale that’s equal parts tragedy and astonishing absurdity. Ready to meet a ménage à trois you’ll never forget?
What happens when reality serves up a story stranger than fiction? This week, an almost cinematic tragedy unfolded in rural Russia: Kseniya Alexandrova—a model, psychologist, and former Miss Universe contender—lost her life after an elk crashed through her Porsche’s windshield. Sometimes, even seatbelts and careful driving can’t compete with the wild’s unscripted plot twists. Curious for the full tale?
Ever wondered what lengths world leaders go to protect their secrets? At the Alaska summit, Putin’s bodyguards turned heads with a suitcase dedicated to, quite literally, presidential waste. Turns out, state secrets aren’t always digital—sometimes they’re biological. Curious how far this strange tradition goes? You’ll want to keep reading.
Imagine showing up to prove you’re alive—because official paperwork says otherwise. Mintu Paswan’s run-in with Bihar’s voter rolls is equal parts comedy and cautionary tale: just how easily can a living vote become a ghost? Bureaucracy’s sense of humor strikes again—find out how (and if) he gets his identity back.