Wild, Odd, Amazing & Bizarre…but 100% REAL…News From Around The Internet.

A Humanoid Robot Tried Its Best to Paint King Charles

Summary for the Curious but Committed to Minimal Effort

  • Humanoid robot artist Ai-Da used digital cameras, AI processing and a robotic arm to paint King Charles III from photographic references, unveiling “Algorithm King” at the AI For Good Summit in Geneva.
  • Created by art dealer Aidan Meller and Engineered Arts, Ai-Da is marketed as the world’s first ultra-realistic robot artist—she’s painted Queen Elizabeth II, exhibited at Tate Modern, V&A and the Venice Biennale, and achieved a $1 million sale at Sotheby’s in 2024.
  • The portrait sparks debate on authenticity, authorship and the nature of machine creativity, highlighting AI’s evolving role in art, culture and ethical discourse.

The British royal family has long been immortalized by brush, camera, and the occasional postage stamp. But in an outcome that feels plucked from some future historian’s fever dream—or maybe just the better episodes of Black Mirror—King Charles III now has a painted portrait courtesy of none other than a humanoid robot, as detailed by Sky News. The king didn’t actually sit for this electronic Michelangelo; the artwork was rendered through a combination of digital cameras for eyes, advanced artificial intelligence processing, and a particularly steady robot arm, all working together on an oil canvas.

Meet Ai-Da, Robot Portraitist-at-Large

Sky News notes that the artist behind this unique portrait is Ai-Da—a name borrowed from Ada Lovelace, often credited as the world’s first computer programmer. Ai-Da is marketed as the world’s first “ultra-realistic robot artist” and isn’t merely a machine with a paintbrush. Created by UK art dealer Aidan Meller and built in Cornwall by Engineered Arts, she not only handles painting duties but uses sophisticated AI language models to converse with humans—blending the roles of creator and commentator in a single cybernetic package.

According to the outlet, Ai-Da’s latest effort, “Algorithm King,” involved analyzing photographic references of King Charles rather than working from a live sitting—perhaps not surprising given both the king’s schedule and the robot’s unique requirements for composing a piece. Interestingly, Ai-Da has done a royal portrait before; back in 2022, she painted Queen Elizabeth II in celebration of the Platinum Jubilee. Both portraits, which neither monarch actually posed for, were exhibited together at the AI For Good Summit in Geneva.

A Robot in the Halls of Power

As highlighted by Sky News, Ai-Da’s reach stretches well beyond British royalty. Her artwork has been featured at venues such as the Tate Modern, V&A, Somerset House, the Design Museum, the Venice Biennale, and even at the Pyramids in Egypt. Notably, she made a bit of auction history in 2024, when a painting attributed to her sold at Sotheby’s for $1 million. Her invitations have not been limited to galleries; she has spoken at the House of Lords, 10 Downing Street, and the United Nations—a rather eclectic CV for a robot.

At the Geneva unveiling, Simon Manley, ambassador and permanent representative to the World Trade Organisation and UN in Geneva, remarked—as cited by Sky News—that Ai-Da is “not just a technological marvel, she is a cultural conversation starter,” embodying British innovation and sparking dialogues on art, ethics, and identity in the age of emerging technologies.

In a quote provided by the outlet, Ai-Da commented herself: “It’s a privilege to be part of this remarkable event at the United Nations, surrounded by those shaping the future of technology and culture. Presenting my portrait of His Majesty King Charles III is not just a creative act, it’s a statement about the evolving role of AI in our society, and to reflect on how artificial intelligence is shaping the cultural landscape.”

Painting Without a Pulse

While skepticism around machine-made art is nothing new, Ai-Da’s very existence seems to prod the boundaries of what is considered truly creative. Sky News quotes Aidan Meller, Ai-Da’s creator, who likens her role to that of the great artists in history—those who questioned and commemorated the shifting world around them. Meller said, “The greatest artists in history grappled with their period of time, and both celebrated and questioned society’s shifts. Ai-Da Robot as technology, is the perfect artist today to discuss the current developments with technology and its unfolding legacy.”

But Meller’s defense raises its own questions: Can a robot “grapple” with anything, or does it simply process, replicate, and reflect the data patterns it’s been served? It’s hard to argue that a machine, regardless of its “ultra-realistic” appearance, brings intent to the canvas in the way a human does.

The Royal Family, Refracted

One cannot help but smile imagining future art historians poring over royal portraits from the early twenty-first century and encountering a little footnote: “This period’s images were painted by a self-aware (or at least self-promoting) robot.” Is there genuine insight in these depictions, or do they remain novelties—moments when the act of creation became more about the creator’s form than the subject depicted? Will the mechanical brushstroke ever carry the same weight as the human hand, or is the true artistic achievement here the very fact that the painting exists?

Perhaps that’s what makes Ai-Da genuinely interesting: her paintings, and the reactions they provoke, are less about the royal visages themselves and more about the evolving dialogue between society, technology, and art. In the end, is this a sign of humanity’s ability to adapt—or evidence that we’re simply finding new ways to keep ourselves entertained as the world grows ever stranger?

Sources:

Related Articles:

San Jose’s mayor isn’t just talking tech—he’s letting ChatGPT draft speeches, triage pothole woes, and tackle city paperwork. Is this the beginning of bureaucracy 2.0, or just a shinier way to move memos? The line between human and algorithm is blurring, and the results are as curious as they are efficient.
When magnetic fields meet metal chains, physics doesn’t negotiate. A New York man’s unfortunate trip inside an active MRI—chain and all—reminds us why those “no metal” warnings aren’t just for show. How did routine caution unravel so spectacularly? Click through for a tale of science, signage, and the pitfalls of ignoring both.
Remember when all it took to access Reddit’s weirdest corners was a wink and a checkbox? Those days are officially over for UK users, thanks to a new law demanding a selfie—or your government ID—just to browse the NSFW bins. Is this privacy protection, digital bureaucracy, or the internet’s latest ironic twist? Click in, and decide for yourself.
When a flock of Canadian ostriches at the center of an avian flu standoff attracts petitions from U.S. presidential hopefuls, memes featuring militant birds, and a swirl of international headlines, you know you’ve landed in top-tier oddity territory. Are we witnessing genuine scientific advocacy or just another round of political theater—ostrich edition? Grab your metaphorical binoculars and dive in.
When Meta claims it needs Australians’ public social posts to teach its AI local lingo—and that a meme about magpies is just as vital as an official law—you have to marvel at the linguistic anthropology happening in your feed. But should every offhand “servo run” really feed a learning machine? The line between observing culture and mining it just got a little blurrier.
There’s something uniquely satisfying about uncovering the extraordinary tucked inside the ordinary—like this long-lost 1949 letter that accidentally led researchers to one of Earth’s rarest minerals. It’s a reminder that the next scientific marvel could be idling quietly among unremarkable archives, just waiting for a curious eye. Who knows what other secrets are gathering dust?